Summary
Alternate Stephen Buckley flagged that state law (RSA 676:3) requires boards to state findings of fact — especially on denials — or risk automatic reversal on appeal. The board will consult the city attorney and consider adding a formal findings step to its rules of procedure.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 11, 2026.
Impact analysis
No direct cost, but skipping findings could mean costly appeals later.
Applicants get clearer, better-defended decisions; the board and city get legal protection.
Mentions & discussions (3)
Zoning Board of Adjustment - May 11, 2026
The board confirmed its habit of adopting a findings-of-fact motion after approving a variance, which protects decisions on appeal. Members also floated trimming the many per-criterion roll call votes.
Zoning Board of Adjustment - Mar 2, 2026
The board has been debating whether to formally record findings of fact for variance decisions. Staff hasn't yet gotten a definitive answer from the city attorney, so the question stays open — it could shape how future variances are documented.
Zoning Board of Adjustment - Feb 2, 2026
Alternate Stephen Buckley flagged that state law (RSA 676:3) requires boards to state findings of fact — especially on denials — or risk automatic reversal on appeal. The board will consult the city attorney and consider adding a formal findings step to its rules of procedure.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Keene
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.