Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Dogs in Woodland Cemetery proposal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 29, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Opposed — says the problem is owners leaving bagged waste behind, and a cemetery is a sacred place where dogs don't belong.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 1:20:46 →A runner who's seen passed-out people and drug exchanges in the cemetery; supports more everyday foot traffic as a proven way to reduce unsafe activity.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 1:22:00 →Supports the proposal — leashed dogs are controlled by their owners, Pat Russell Park already has worse dog waste problems, and the real issue is enforcement.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 1:24:22 →Walks the cemetery almost daily and finds it peaceful; worries more dogs — many off-leash — would frighten fragile walkers and change a place she loves.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 1:26:00 →Frequent visitor who considers it sacred and fears loose dogs; says Keene has a dog park and other places for dogs — the cemetery shouldn't be one.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 1:30:33 →Loves dogs but has conducted committal services there; says free-range dogs and enforcement failures make the cemetery the wrong place for them.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 1:32:00 →Supports the change — 'eyes on the street' theory says more people make places safer, and bans only keep out the well-behaved.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 47:36 →Favors a one-year trial with publicity, signage and electronic signs at entrances asking for respectful behavior.
Municipal Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee - Apr 29, 2026 · 42:58 →